Public knowledge intelligence

Mzizi

Public information is only useful when you can tell what is true, when it was true and where it came from.

Mzizi explores civic and political knowledge as a structured system: people, institutions, claims, records, dates and sources connected in ways that can be inspected instead of hidden behind a generated answer.

Researcher looking through an archive catalogue
Archives / evidence / retrievalPhoto: Tima Miroshnichenko / Pexels ↗
ProvenanceTime-aware factsInstitutionsPublic recordsExplainable retrievalSource chains

Knowledge model

Answers need a history.

Political and civic information changes over time. A useful system needs to model both the fact and its validity window, then expose the evidence behind it.

Time

Facts are attached to periods and events instead of treated as permanently true.

Provenance

Every important claim can point back to records, documents or identifiable sources.

Relationships

People, institutions, positions and events form an inspectable graph of public knowledge.

Retrieval

Search and AI interfaces should show why a result was returned, not only produce prose.

Example provenance chain

From claim to evidence.

ClaimPerson X holds Office Y
Valid fromA dated appointment or election event
SourceOfficial record, gazette, institution or verified publication
ConfidenceEvidence strength and any unresolved conflict
HistoryPrior holders, changes and superseded facts

Research questions

Trust has to be engineered.

01

How should conflicting public records be represented instead of silently reconciled?

02

How can a system distinguish current facts from historically correct but outdated facts?

03

What evidence should be visible to a user before an AI-generated civic answer is considered trustworthy?

04

How do we make political knowledge searchable without flattening uncertainty or context?

Next: FarmAI